Follow #32460
Now the code could be much clearer than before and easier to maintain. A
lot of legacy code is removed.
Manually tested.
This PR is large enough, that fine tunes could be deferred to the future if
there is no bug found or design problem.
Screenshots:
<details>
</details>
Fix#32453
Major changes:
* revert the `<div class="divider"></div>` in
`templates/repo/issue/branch_selector_field.tmpl` (it was removed by
mistake in ##32444)
* remove incorrect `<div class="inline field">` in
`templates/repo/issue/sidebar/allow_maintainer_edit.tmpl`
* use `gt-ellipsis` to replace the "title" class in the dependency list,
then `.repository .issue-content-right .ui.list .title` could be removed
* remove the "relaxed" from dependency list, then there is no padding,
then `.repository .issue-content-right .ui.list .dependency` could be
removed (`white-space` doesn't have effect either because there is
`gt-ellipsis`)
* remove dead code `.repository .issue-content-right #deadlineForm input
`
The fixed UI should be the same as before.
- [x] Move `CreateRepositoryByExample` to service layer
- [x] Move `AddCollabrator` to service layer
- [x] Add a new parameter for `AddCollabrator` so that changing mode
immediately after that will become unnecessary.
From testing, I found that issue posters and users with repository write
access are able to edit attachment names in a way that circumvents the
instance-level file extension restrictions using the edit attachment
APIs. This snapshot adds checks for these endpoints.
Use zero instead of 9999-12-31 for deadline
Fix#32291
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
1. clarify the "filepath" could(should) contain "{ref}"
2. remove unclear RepoRefLegacy and RepoRefAny, use RepoRefUnknown to guess
3. by the way, avoid using AppURL
Follow #32383
This PR cleans up the "Deadline" usages in templates, make them call
`ParseLegacy` first to get a `Time` struct then display by `DateUtils`.
Now it should be pretty clear how "deadline string" works, it makes it
possible to do further refactoring and correcting.
This introduces a new flag `BlockAdminMergeOverride` on the branch
protection rules that prevents admins/repo owners from bypassing branch
protection rules and merging without approvals or failing status checks.
Fixes#17131
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
These settings can allow users to only display the repositories explore page.
Thanks to yp05327 and wxiaoguang !
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This PR fixes javascript errors when an anonymous user visits the
migration page.
It also makes task view checking more restrictive.
The router moved from `/user/task/{id}/status` to
`/username/reponame/-/migrate/status` because it's a migrate status.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Close#278Close#24076
## Solutions:
- Use
[google/licenseclassifier](https://github.com/google/licenseclassifier/)
Test result between
[google/licensecheck](https://github.com/google/licensecheck) and
[go-license-detector](https://github.com/go-enry/go-license-detector):
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24872#issuecomment-1560361167
Test result between
[google/licensecheck](https://github.com/google/licensecheck) and
[google/licenseclassifier](https://github.com/google/licenseclassifier/):
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24872#issuecomment-1576092178
- Generate License Convert Name List to avoid import license templates
with same contents
Gitea automatically get latest license data from[
spdx/license-list-data](https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data).
But unfortunately, some license templates have same contents. #20915
[click here to see the
list](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24872#issuecomment-1584141684)
So we will generate a list of these license templates with same contents
and create a new file to save the result when using `make
generate-license`. (Need to decide the save path)
- Save License info into a new table `repo_license`
Can easily support searching repo by license in the future.
## Screen shot
Single License:
Multiple Licenses:
Triggers:
- [x] Push commit to default branch
- [x] Create repo
- [x] Mirror repo
- [x] When Default Branch is changed, licenses should be updated
Todo:
- [x] Save Licenses info in to DB when there's a change to license file
in the commit
- [x] DB Migration
- [x] A nominal test?
- [x] Select which library to
use(https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24872#issuecomment-1560361167)
- [x] API Support
- [x] Add repo license table
- ~Select license in settings if there are several licenses(Not
recommended)~
- License board(later, not in this PR)
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <kontakt@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <m.huber@kithara.com>
Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.com>
This PR do some minor improvements for head branch display on pull
request view UI.
- [x] Remove the link if the head branch has been deleted with a
tooltip, so that users will not result in a 404 page
- [x] Display a label if this pull request is an agit based one.
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/31686.
A more elborate manual tabindex numbering could be done, but I think
it's not really worth the extra effort and such stuff could easily break
during refactors.
Includes another small tweak to un-stretch the`<a>` element so it's only
as large as it needs to be and this change also made the margin
unneeded.
Part of #27700
Removes all URLs from translation strings to easy up changing them in
the future and to exclude people injecting malicious URLs through
translations. First measure as long as #24402 is out of scope.
like user profile, add a new overviw tab to show profile READEME when it
is exist.
replace #31349 (another solution option)
example view:
---------
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
This Pull Request adds missing tool tips for the protected, copy, and rss icons on the branch list page. It also moved protected icon position after the branch name.
Fix#10036
This PR adds some labels for tags of this commit after the commit
message on the commits table. The tag template is share as commit
graph's.
Desktop:
<img width="1302" alt="image"
src="ba94e1e6-2a3d-44f3-85a3-575fb5667c97">
Mobile:
<img width="370" alt="image"
src="e3eb1f44-3686-4012-aa9d-52cd88b22c0e">
fix#23668
My plan:
* In the `actions.list` method, if workflow is selected and IsAdmin,
check whether the on event contains `workflow_dispatch`. If so, display
a `Run workflow` button to allow the user to manually trigger the run.
* Providing a form that allows users to select target brach or tag, and
these parameters can be configured in yaml
* Simple form validation, `required` input cannot be empty
* Add a route `/actions/run`, and an `actions.Run` method to handle
* Add `WorkflowDispatchPayload` struct to pass the Webhook event payload
to the runner when triggered, this payload carries the `inputs` values
and other fields, doc: [workflow_dispatch
payload](https://docs.github.com/en/webhooks/webhook-events-and-payloads#workflow_dispatch)
Other PRs
* the `Workflow.WorkflowDispatchConfig()` method still return non-nil
when workflow_dispatch is not defined. I submitted a PR
https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/85 to fix it. Still waiting for them
to process.
Behavior should be same with github, but may cause confusion. Here's a
quick reminder.
*
[Doc](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#workflow_dispatch)
Said: This event will `only` trigger a workflow run if the workflow file
is `on the default branch`.
* If the workflow yaml file only exists in a non-default branch, it
cannot be triggered. (It will not even show up in the workflow list)
* If the same workflow yaml file exists in each branch at the same time,
the version of the default branch is used. Even if `Use workflow from`
selects another branch
```yaml
name: Docker Image CI
on:
workflow_dispatch:
inputs:
logLevel:
description: 'Log level'
required: true
default: 'warning'
type: choice
options:
- info
- warning
- debug
tags:
description: 'Test scenario tags'
required: false
type: boolean
boolean_default_true:
description: 'Test scenario tags'
required: true
type: boolean
default: true
boolean_default_false:
description: 'Test scenario tags'
required: false
type: boolean
default: false
environment:
description: 'Environment to run tests against'
type: environment
required: true
default: 'environment values'
number_required_1:
description: 'number '
type: number
required: true
default: '100'
number_required_2:
description: 'number'
type: number
required: true
default: '100'
number_required_3:
description: 'number'
type: number
required: true
default: '100'
number_1:
description: 'number'
type: number
required: false
number_2:
description: 'number'
type: number
required: false
number_3:
description: 'number'
type: number
required: false
env:
inputs_logLevel: ${{ inputs.logLevel }}
inputs_tags: ${{ inputs.tags }}
inputs_boolean_default_true: ${{ inputs.boolean_default_true }}
inputs_boolean_default_false: ${{ inputs.boolean_default_false }}
inputs_environment: ${{ inputs.environment }}
inputs_number_1: ${{ inputs.number_1 }}
inputs_number_2: ${{ inputs.number_2 }}
inputs_number_3: ${{ inputs.number_3 }}
inputs_number_required_1: ${{ inputs.number_required_1 }}
inputs_number_required_2: ${{ inputs.number_required_2 }}
inputs_number_required_3: ${{ inputs.number_required_3 }}
jobs:
build:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
- run: ls -la
- run: env | grep inputs
- run: echo ${{ inputs.logLevel }}
- run: echo ${{ inputs.boolean_default_false }}
```
---------
Co-authored-by: TKaxv_7S <954067342@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <kontakt@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
When transferring repositories that have issues linked to a project
board to another organization, the issues remain associated with the
original project board. This causes the columns in the project board to
become bugged, making it difficult to move other issues in or out of the
affected columns. As a solution, I removed the issue relations since the
other organization does not have this project table.
Fix for #31538
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
