This introduces a new flag `BlockAdminMergeOverride` on the branch
protection rules that prevents admins/repo owners from bypassing branch
protection rules and merging without approvals or failing status checks.
Fixes#17131
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
This PR fixes javascript errors when an anonymous user visits the
migration page.
It also makes task view checking more restrictive.
The router moved from `/user/task/{id}/status` to
`/username/reponame/-/migrate/status` because it's a migrate status.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Close#278Close#24076
## Solutions:
- Use
[google/licenseclassifier](https://github.com/google/licenseclassifier/)
Test result between
[google/licensecheck](https://github.com/google/licensecheck) and
[go-license-detector](https://github.com/go-enry/go-license-detector):
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24872#issuecomment-1560361167
Test result between
[google/licensecheck](https://github.com/google/licensecheck) and
[google/licenseclassifier](https://github.com/google/licenseclassifier/):
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24872#issuecomment-1576092178
- Generate License Convert Name List to avoid import license templates
with same contents
Gitea automatically get latest license data from[
spdx/license-list-data](https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data).
But unfortunately, some license templates have same contents. #20915
[click here to see the
list](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24872#issuecomment-1584141684)
So we will generate a list of these license templates with same contents
and create a new file to save the result when using `make
generate-license`. (Need to decide the save path)
- Save License info into a new table `repo_license`
Can easily support searching repo by license in the future.
## Screen shot
Single License:
Multiple Licenses:
Triggers:
- [x] Push commit to default branch
- [x] Create repo
- [x] Mirror repo
- [x] When Default Branch is changed, licenses should be updated
Todo:
- [x] Save Licenses info in to DB when there's a change to license file
in the commit
- [x] DB Migration
- [x] A nominal test?
- [x] Select which library to
use(https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24872#issuecomment-1560361167)
- [x] API Support
- [x] Add repo license table
- ~Select license in settings if there are several licenses(Not
recommended)~
- License board(later, not in this PR)
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <kontakt@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <m.huber@kithara.com>
Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.com>
This PR do some minor improvements for head branch display on pull
request view UI.
- [x] Remove the link if the head branch has been deleted with a
tooltip, so that users will not result in a 404 page
- [x] Display a label if this pull request is an agit based one.
Part of #27700
Removes all URLs from translation strings to easy up changing them in
the future and to exclude people injecting malicious URLs through
translations. First measure as long as #24402 is out of scope.
This Pull Request adds missing tool tips for the protected, copy, and rss icons on the branch list page. It also moved protected icon position after the branch name.
Fix#10036
This PR adds some labels for tags of this commit after the commit
message on the commits table. The tag template is share as commit
graph's.
Desktop:
<img width="1302" alt="image"
src="ba94e1e6-2a3d-44f3-85a3-575fb5667c97">
Mobile:
<img width="370" alt="image"
src="e3eb1f44-3686-4012-aa9d-52cd88b22c0e">
fix#23668
My plan:
* In the `actions.list` method, if workflow is selected and IsAdmin,
check whether the on event contains `workflow_dispatch`. If so, display
a `Run workflow` button to allow the user to manually trigger the run.
* Providing a form that allows users to select target brach or tag, and
these parameters can be configured in yaml
* Simple form validation, `required` input cannot be empty
* Add a route `/actions/run`, and an `actions.Run` method to handle
* Add `WorkflowDispatchPayload` struct to pass the Webhook event payload
to the runner when triggered, this payload carries the `inputs` values
and other fields, doc: [workflow_dispatch
payload](https://docs.github.com/en/webhooks/webhook-events-and-payloads#workflow_dispatch)
Other PRs
* the `Workflow.WorkflowDispatchConfig()` method still return non-nil
when workflow_dispatch is not defined. I submitted a PR
https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/85 to fix it. Still waiting for them
to process.
Behavior should be same with github, but may cause confusion. Here's a
quick reminder.
*
[Doc](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#workflow_dispatch)
Said: This event will `only` trigger a workflow run if the workflow file
is `on the default branch`.
* If the workflow yaml file only exists in a non-default branch, it
cannot be triggered. (It will not even show up in the workflow list)
* If the same workflow yaml file exists in each branch at the same time,
the version of the default branch is used. Even if `Use workflow from`
selects another branch
```yaml
name: Docker Image CI
on:
workflow_dispatch:
inputs:
logLevel:
description: 'Log level'
required: true
default: 'warning'
type: choice
options:
- info
- warning
- debug
tags:
description: 'Test scenario tags'
required: false
type: boolean
boolean_default_true:
description: 'Test scenario tags'
required: true
type: boolean
default: true
boolean_default_false:
description: 'Test scenario tags'
required: false
type: boolean
default: false
environment:
description: 'Environment to run tests against'
type: environment
required: true
default: 'environment values'
number_required_1:
description: 'number '
type: number
required: true
default: '100'
number_required_2:
description: 'number'
type: number
required: true
default: '100'
number_required_3:
description: 'number'
type: number
required: true
default: '100'
number_1:
description: 'number'
type: number
required: false
number_2:
description: 'number'
type: number
required: false
number_3:
description: 'number'
type: number
required: false
env:
inputs_logLevel: ${{ inputs.logLevel }}
inputs_tags: ${{ inputs.tags }}
inputs_boolean_default_true: ${{ inputs.boolean_default_true }}
inputs_boolean_default_false: ${{ inputs.boolean_default_false }}
inputs_environment: ${{ inputs.environment }}
inputs_number_1: ${{ inputs.number_1 }}
inputs_number_2: ${{ inputs.number_2 }}
inputs_number_3: ${{ inputs.number_3 }}
inputs_number_required_1: ${{ inputs.number_required_1 }}
inputs_number_required_2: ${{ inputs.number_required_2 }}
inputs_number_required_3: ${{ inputs.number_required_3 }}
jobs:
build:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
- run: ls -la
- run: env | grep inputs
- run: echo ${{ inputs.logLevel }}
- run: echo ${{ inputs.boolean_default_false }}
```
---------
Co-authored-by: TKaxv_7S <954067342@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <kontakt@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
When transferring repositories that have issues linked to a project
board to another organization, the issues remain associated with the
original project board. This causes the columns in the project board to
become bugged, making it difficult to move other issues in or out of the
affected columns. As a solution, I removed the issue relations since the
other organization does not have this project table.
Fix for #31538
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Moved repository visibility to the danger zone in the settings area. To
change the visibility, it is necessary to go to the danger zone, click
on the private/public button, and accept the change in the modal.
Resolves: #23826
---
## Screenshots
<details>
<summary>Before</summary>
Private repo:
Public repo:
</details>
<details>
<summary>After</summary>
Make private:
Make private modal
Make public:
Make public modal
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Kemal Zebari <60799661+kemzeb@users.noreply.github.com>
Fix#27278
Replace #27816
This PR adds a meta-comment for an issue when dragging an issue from one
column to another of a project.
<img width="600" alt="image"
src="5fc1d954-430e-4db0-aaee-a00006fa91f5">
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
#26996
Added default sorting for milestones by name.
Additional, name for sorting closestduedate and furthestduedate was
broken, so I fixed it.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Fixes#22722
### Problem
Currently, it is not possible to force push to a branch with branch
protection rules in place. There are often times where this is necessary
(CI workflows/administrative tasks etc).
The current workaround is to rename/remove the branch protection,
perform the force push, and then reinstate the protections.
### Solution
Provide an additional section in the branch protection rules to allow
users to specify which users with push access can also force push to the
branch. The default value of the rule will be set to `Disabled`, and the
UI is intuitive and very similar to the `Push` section.
It is worth noting in this implementation that allowing force push does
not override regular push access, and both will need to be enabled for a
user to force push.
This applies to manual force push to a remote, and also in Gitea UI
updating a PR by rebase (which requires force push)
This modifies the `BranchProtection` API structs to add:
- `enable_force_push bool`
- `enable_force_push_whitelist bool`
- `force_push_whitelist_usernames string[]`
- `force_push_whitelist_teams string[]`
- `force_push_whitelist_deploy_keys bool`
### Updated Branch Protection UI:
<img width="943" alt="image"
src="7491899c-d816-45d5-be84-8512abd156bf">
### Pull Request `Update branch by Rebase` option enabled with source
branch `test` being a protected branch:
<img width="1038" alt="image"
src="57ead13e-9006-459f-b83c-7079e6f4c654">
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Many avatars were rendered in HTML with certain width/height but then
resized again in CSS. This was pointless so I removed all these cases
and made the HTML size match the previous render size.
Also did a few CSS cleanups in the tribute rendering:
<img width="648" alt="image"
src="cb2fafb3-5e20-46e9-814f-07df20038beb">
Uses the correct string for searching - this is what it looks like prior
to the change:
(observe how the top box has "Search teams" even though collaborator
would be user
Given an empty issue/PR comment, the comment history would not be
updated if the user were to submit it. Therefore, it would make since to
just disable the comment button when the text editor is empty.
This is inline with what GitHub does when given empty text editor input.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
1. There are already global "unit consts", no need to use context data, which is fragile
2. Remove the "String()" method from "unit", it would only cause rendering problems in templates
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Remove and forbid [.text()](https://api.jquery.com/text/). Tested some,
but not all functionality, but I think these are pretty safe
replacements.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This PR introduces the `ReviewedOn` and `ReviewedBy` variables for the
default merge message templates (e.g.,
`.gitea/default_merge_message/MERGE_TEMPLATE.md`).
This allows customizing the default merge messages while retaining these
trailers.
This also moves the associated logic out of `pull.tmpl` into the
relevant Go function.
This is a first contribution towards #11077.
---
For illustration, this allows to recreate the "default default" merge
message with the following template:
```
.gitea/default_merge_message/MERGE_TEMPLATE.md
Merge pull request '${PullRequestTitle}' (${PullRequestReference}) from ${HeadBranch} into ${BaseBranch}
${ReviewedOn}
${ReviewedBy}
```
`overflow-wrap: anywhere` is a superior alternative to `word-wrap:
break-word` and we were already setting it in the class. I tested a few
cases, all look good.
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/31068
- Now it only does a single call to `GetExpandDirection` per line
instead of multiples.
- Exposed `data-expand-direction` to frontend so it can correctly size
the buttons (it's a pain to do in tables).
<img width="142" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-27 at 20 44 56"
src="8b0b45a6-8e50-4081-8822-5e0775d8d941">
<img width="142" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-27 at 20 44 51"
src="b7ba2c57-8f55-4e9f-9606-c96d16b77892">
<img width="132" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-27 at 20 44 46"
src="0e838fb8-5e8c-4250-9843-a68b88d5418b">
<img width="80" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-27 at 20 44 33"
src="da6c7f83-c160-4389-8ab2-889d0568cbe8">
<img width="80" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-27 at 20 44 26"
src="cdb490b2-5040-484a-92e5-46fc5e37c199">
<img width="78" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-27 at 20 44 20"
src="d2978ab0-764e-41ff-922c-25f8fe749f28">
Would backport as trivial enhancement.
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/31071
Not perfect but much better than before.
Before: Overflows, sticky not working, filename unreadable:
<img width="506" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-27 at 02 02 40"
src="a06b1edf-dece-4402-98c2-68670fca265f">
After:
<img width="457" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-27 at 01 59 06"
src="2a282c96-e719-4554-b418-81963ae6269c">
This PR split the `Board` into two parts. One is the struct has been
renamed to `Column` and the second we have a `Template Type`.
But to make it easier to review, this PR will not change the database
schemas, they are just renames. The database schema changes could be in
future PRs.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
Instead of always displaying all available actions as buttons, merge
them into a single dropdown menu, same as GitHub. That decreases visual
overload and is more mobile-friendly, while not losing any
functionality.
## Screenshots
<details><summary>Before</summary>
</details>
<details><summary>After (unexpanded)</summary>
</details>
<details><summary>After (expanded)</summary>
</details>
