It doesn't change logic, it only does:
1. Rename the variable and function names
2. Use more consistent format when mentioning config section&key
3. Improve some messages
## Changes
- Adds setting `EXTERNAL_USER_DISABLE_FEATURES` to disable any supported
user features when login type is not plain
- In general, this is necessary for SSO implementations to avoid
inconsistencies between the external account management and the linked
account
- Adds helper functions to encourage correct use
Resolves#29965.
---
Manually tested this by:
- Following the
[installation](https://docs.gitea.com/next/installation/install-with-docker#basics)
guide (but built a local Docker image instead)
- Creating 2 users, one who is the `Owner` of a newly-created repository
and the other a `Collaborator`
- Had the `Collaborator` create a PR that the `Owner` reviews
- `Collaborator` resolves conversation and `Owner` merges PR
And with this change we see that we can no longer see re-request review
button for the `Owner`:
<img width="1351" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-25 at 12 39 18 AM"
src="bcd9c579-3cf7-474f-a51e-b436fe1a39a4">
On creation of an empty project (no template) a default board will be
created instead of falling back to the uneditable pseudo-board.
Every project now has to have exactly one default boards. As a
consequence, you cannot unset a board as default, instead you have to
set another board as default. Existing projects will be modified using a
cron job, additionally this check will run every midnight by default.
Deleting the default board is not allowed, you have to set another board
as default to do it.
Fixes#29873Fixes#14679 along the way
Fixes#29853
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Resolve#23848
This PR put an edit file button on pull request files to allow a quick
edit for a file. After the edit finished, it will return back to the
viewed file position on pull request files tab.
It also use a branch view file link instead of commit link when it's a
non-commit pull request files view.
<img width="1532" alt="image"
src="3637ca4c-89d5-4621-847b-79702a44f617">
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
By using git's ability, end users (especially small instance users) do
not need to enable the indexer, they could also benefit from the code
searching feature.
Fix#29996
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
1. Restore missing styles for message close icon
2. Move `code-line-button` so that it does not go off-screen on small
viewports
3. Make `code-line-button` look and behave like other buttons
4. Make `code-line-button` work in blame
5. Make the active selection span the whole line, not just the code part
6. Tweak colors, make dark theme code bg darker, make line numbers same
color in diff and file view.
7. Move code background to parent, fixing border radius and other
problems
8. Enable code wrap in blame
9. Improve blame responsiveness
10. Remove `--color-code-sidebar-bg` in blame, now it uses same
background as code
11. Rename `--color-active-line` to `--color-highlight-bg`
12. Add `--color-highlight-bg`
13. Fix button group borders on hover and border-right on last button.
<img width="1343" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-23 at 22 34 13"
src="fcbb919f-5dc3-43f0-97f6-870d6f412554">
<img width="1334" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-23 at 22 34 26"
src="ca44c3b7-4328-4645-ba49-b0dc6a5ac06d">
<img width="1338" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-23 at 22 34 57"
src="00eb0b5a-1ec7-4669-a94a-4602b9d1c1ac">
<img width="1337" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-23 at 22 34 42"
src="752edc4a-064f-413c-9dff-c086187fcd85">
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/18074
Fix#28761Fix#27884Fix#28093
## Changes
### Rerun all jobs
When rerun all jobs, status of the jobs with `needs` will be set to
`blocked` instead of `waiting`. Therefore, these jobs will not run until
the required jobs are completed.
### Rerun a single job
When a single job is rerun, its dependents should also be rerun, just
like GitHub does
(https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/28761#issuecomment-2008620820).
In this case, only the specified job will be set to `waiting`, its
dependents will be set to `blocked` to wait the job.
### Show warning if every job has `needs`
If every job in a workflow has `needs`, all jobs will be blocked and no
job can be run. So I add a warning message.
<img
src="88f43511-2360-465d-be96-ee92b57ff67b"
width="480px" />
This PR will avoid load pullrequest.Issue twice in pull request list
page. It will reduce x times database queries for those WIP pull
requests.
Partially fix#29585
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Regression of #29493. If a branch has been deleted, repushing it won't
restore it.
Lunny may have noticed that, but I didn't delve into the comment then
overlooked it:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/29493#discussion_r1509046867
The additional comments added are to explain the issue I found during
testing, which are unrelated to the fixes.
The error message:
`editor.file_changed_while_editing = The file contents have changed
since you started editing. <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
href="%s">Click here</a> to see them or <strong>Commit Changes
again</strong> to overwrite them.`
Is re-used in inappropriate contexts. The link in the key goes to a 404
when the key is used in a situation where the file contents have not
changed.
Added two new keys to differentiate commit id mismatch and push out of
date conditions.
Fix#20175
Current implementation of API does not allow creating pull requests
between branches of the same
repo when you specify *namespace* (owner of the repo) in `head` field in
http request body.
---
Although GitHub implementation of API allows performing such action and
since Gitea targeting
compatibility with GitHub API I see it as an appropriate change.
I'm proposing a fix to the described problem and test case which covers
this logic.
My use-case just in case:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/20175#issuecomment-1711283022
When read the code: `pager.AddParam(ctx, "search", "search")`, the
question always comes: What is it doing? Where is the value from? Why
"search" / "search" ?
Now it is clear: `pager.AddParamIfExist("search", ctx.Data["search"])`
Unify all but a few search boxes to use uniform style, uniform
translations and shared templates where possible.
Remove a few duplicated search templates, e. g. code search.
<details><summary>Example after screenshots:</summary>
</details>
Also includes #29700
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <m.huber@kithara.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Caused by: #23106
Fix:
2264033569
1. Delete `UserBadgeList` in `options.go`, because it wasn't used. (The
struct defined in `options.go` is the struct used to parse the request
body)
2. Move `BadgeList` struct under `routers/api/v1/swagger` folder which
response should be defined in.
This PR do some performance optimzations.
- [x] Add `index` for the column `comment_id` of `Attachment` table to
accelerate query from the database.
- [x] Remove unnecessary database queries when viewing issues. Before
some conditions which id = 0 will be sent to the database
- [x] Remove duplicated load posters
- [x] Batch loading attachements, isread of comments on viewing issue
---------
Co-authored-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
This PR do some loading speed optimization for feeds user interface
pages.
- Load action users batchly but not one by one.
- Load action repositories batchly but not one by one.
- Load action's Repo Owners batchly but not one by one.
- Load action's possible issues batchly but not one by one.
- Load action's possible comments batchly but not one by one.
