Use batch database operations instead of one by one to optimze api pulls (#32680)
Resolve #31492 The response time for the Pull Requests API has improved significantly, dropping from over `2000ms` to about `350ms` on my local machine. It's about `6` times faster. A key area for further optimization lies in batch-fetching data for `apiPullRequest.ChangedFiles, apiPullRequest.Additions, and apiPullRequest.Deletions`. Tests `TestAPIViewPulls` does exist and new tests added. - This PR also fixes some bugs in `GetDiff` functions. - This PR also fixes data inconsistent in test data. For a pull request, the head branch's reference should be equal to the reference in `pull/xxx/head`.
This commit is contained in:
parent
2ac6f2b129
commit
fbe6d9dc6b
15 changed files with 566 additions and 93 deletions
|
@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ func TestListPullCommits(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &pullCommitList)
|
||||
|
||||
if assert.Len(t, pullCommitList.Commits, 2) {
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, "5f22f7d0d95d614d25a5b68592adb345a4b5c7fd", pullCommitList.Commits[0].ID)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, "4a357436d925b5c974181ff12a994538ddc5a269", pullCommitList.Commits[1].ID)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, "985f0301dba5e7b34be866819cd15ad3d8f508ee", pullCommitList.Commits[0].ID)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, "5c050d3b6d2db231ab1f64e324f1b6b9a0b181c2", pullCommitList.Commits[1].ID)
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, "4a357436d925b5c974181ff12a994538ddc5a269", pullCommitList.LastReviewCommitSha)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue