Require at least one unit to be enabled (#24189)
Don't remember why the previous decision that `Code` and `Release` are non-disable units globally. Since now every unit include `Code` could be disabled, maybe we should have a new rule that the repo should have at least one unit. So any unit could be disabled. Fixes #20960 Fixes #7525 --------- Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de> Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0ebabf3c6b
commit
e5a8ebc0ed
9 changed files with 109 additions and 75 deletions
|
@ -970,9 +970,11 @@ func updateRepoUnits(ctx *context.APIContext, opts api.EditRepoOption) error {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if err := repo_model.UpdateRepositoryUnits(repo, units, deleteUnitTypes); err != nil {
|
||||
ctx.Error(http.StatusInternalServerError, "UpdateRepositoryUnits", err)
|
||||
return err
|
||||
if len(units)+len(deleteUnitTypes) > 0 {
|
||||
if err := repo_model.UpdateRepositoryUnits(repo, units, deleteUnitTypes); err != nil {
|
||||
ctx.Error(http.StatusInternalServerError, "UpdateRepositoryUnits", err)
|
||||
return err
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
log.Trace("Repository advanced settings updated: %s/%s", owner.Name, repo.Name)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue