Clarify permission "HasAccess" behavior (#30585)

Follow #30495

"HasAccess" behavior wasn't clear, to make it clear:

* Use a new name `HasAnyUnitAccess`, it will be easier to review related
code and permission problems.
* Separate everyone access mode to a separate field, then all calls to
HasAccess are reverted to old behavior before #30495.
* Add new tests.

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
This commit is contained in:
wxiaoguang 2024-04-20 11:15:04 +08:00 committed by GitHub
parent 89e39872ff
commit 48d4580dd5
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
13 changed files with 96 additions and 41 deletions

View file

@ -79,17 +79,17 @@ func TestHasAccess(t *testing.T) {
repo2 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 3})
assert.True(t, repo2.IsPrivate)
has, err := access_model.HasAccess(db.DefaultContext, user1.ID, repo1)
has, err := access_model.HasAnyUnitAccess(db.DefaultContext, user1.ID, repo1)
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.True(t, has)
_, err = access_model.HasAccess(db.DefaultContext, user1.ID, repo2)
_, err = access_model.HasAnyUnitAccess(db.DefaultContext, user1.ID, repo2)
assert.NoError(t, err)
_, err = access_model.HasAccess(db.DefaultContext, user2.ID, repo1)
_, err = access_model.HasAnyUnitAccess(db.DefaultContext, user2.ID, repo1)
assert.NoError(t, err)
_, err = access_model.HasAccess(db.DefaultContext, user2.ID, repo2)
_, err = access_model.HasAnyUnitAccess(db.DefaultContext, user2.ID, repo2)
assert.NoError(t, err)
}